GOV.UK
West Berkshire Council
Accessibility Directive Audit
Incomplete applications
7
Incomplete applications
5 SME, 2 large
Completed applications
7
Completed applications
6 SME, 1 large
| Opportunity attribute name | Opportunity attribute value |
|---|---|
| Published | Wednesday 13 February 2019 |
| Deadline for asking questions | Wednesday 20 February 2019 at 11:59pm GMT |
| Closing date for applications | Wednesday 27 February 2019 at 11:59pm GMT |
Overview
| Opportunity attribute name | Opportunity attribute value |
|---|---|
| Summary of the work | Audit our public facing digital estate against WCAG 2.1 AA and produce a report detailing which sites and pages are not meeting this standard. |
| Latest start date | Monday 18 March 2019 |
| Expected contract length | |
| Location | No specific location, eg they can work remotely |
| Organisation the work is for | West Berkshire Council |
| Budget range | The maximum value of this contract will be £9,750. |
About the work
| Opportunity attribute name | Opportunity attribute value |
|---|---|
| Why the work is being done | The EU Accessibility Directive comes into force on 23 September 2019 and requires public sector organisations to ensure their websites are accessible, and to publish an accessibility statement. |
| Problem to be solved |
Although all our digital services and websites should be accessible according to the Equality Act 2010, we have never conducted a full audit of our public facing digital estate and therefore cannot reliably write an accessibility statement. This work will enable us to correct any accessibly issues found, determine where corrections would constitute a “disproportionate burden”, and write an accessibility statement. |
| Who the users are and what they need to do | This work will not deliver a service, however it will help us better meet the needs of people who access the council's information or services online. |
| Early market engagement | |
| Any work that’s already been done | |
| Existing team | This is a stand alone piece of work. |
| Current phase | Not applicable |
Work setup
| Opportunity attribute name | Opportunity attribute value |
|---|---|
| Address where the work will take place | This work can be completed remotely. |
| Working arrangements | To reduce travel cost and time this work can be completed remotely. Once the work is underway, meetings can be conducted online. |
| Security clearance |
Additional information
| Opportunity attribute name | Opportunity attribute value |
|---|---|
| Additional terms and conditions |
Skills and experience
Buyers will use the essential and nice-to-have skills and experience to help them evaluate suppliers’ technical competence.
| Opportunity attribute name | Opportunity attribute value |
|---|---|
| Essential skills and experience |
|
| Nice-to-have skills and experience | Involvement in the wider accessibility community - for example through publishing blog posts, running training and contributing to standards |
How suppliers will be evaluated
| Opportunity attribute name | Opportunity attribute value |
|---|---|
| How many suppliers to evaluate | 3 |
| Proposal criteria |
|
| Cultural fit criteria | Work as a team with our organisation |
| Payment approach | Fixed price |
| Assessment methods |
|
| Evaluation weighting |
Technical competence 50%
Cultural fit 5%
Price 45%
|
Questions asked by suppliers
| Supplier question | Buyer answer |
|---|---|
| 1. Please can you advise whether testing with users who have disabilities is in scope of this piece of work? Or is this project purely to assess compliance against WCAG 2.1? |
We would like all our digital estate assessed against WCAG 2.1 with the option to test a limited subset of it with users who have disabilities against. Experience of the latter should be demonstrated as part of you application and should be detailed (including cost) if requested to submit a written proposal. |
| 2. Can you provide examples of the service or pages you would like to be assessed? |
For pages under these domains we will only require a report against WCAG 2.1 AA https://publicaccess.westberks.gov.uk https://www.civicaepay.co.uk/WestBerkshireEstore/estore/default/Catalog/Index https://ats-westberkshire.jobsgopublic.com https://westberks.spydus.co.uk http://ww2.westberks.gov.uk http://decisionmaking.westberks.gov.uk https://ems.westberks.gov.uk http://consult.westberks.gov.uk/portal http://parish.westberks.gov.uk http://jobs.westberks.gov.uk https://www.homechoicewb.org.uk https://www.westberkshireheritage.org/ https://booking.westberks.gov.uk/heritage_events.html https://booking.westberks.gov.uk/all_events.html For pages under these domains we would also like the option of more detailed accessibility testing, budget permitting: https://www.westberks.gov.uk https://citizen.westberks.gov.uk (home page directs to www.westberks.gov.uk) https://info.westberks.gov.uk (home page directs to www.westberks.gov.uk) https://directory.westberks.gov.uk |
| 3. Would the supplier need to take care of the recruitment of participants? | This would depend on the type of test, but as a general rule we would recruit the participants. |
| 4. Since you have an extremely large website, and since to audit all or even most of the pages would be prohibitively expensive, do you expect the chosen auditor to audit just a very small subset of the pages, chosen to cover a range of the components and layouts that exist on the website? | The content management system for many of our sites utilises a number of different templates to render content. It should therefore be possible to audit a handful of pages per template in order to report whether all of them conform to many elements of WCAG 2.1 AA. |
| 5. The ‘participants’ mentioned in question 3, please can you confirm who you are referring to, eg. people with disabilities? | Question 3 was was raised by a supplier. We took "participants" to mean people who have one or more disability, who would partake in user testing. |
| 6. Does the maximum budget figure of £9,750 exclude VAT? | The budget figure excludes VAT and suppliers should quote excluding VAT. |
| 7. Please can you confirm the total number of web pages to be tested against WCAG 2.1 AA contained in the domains you listed in your the first part of your answer to question 2? And the total number of web pages contained in the domains you listed in the second part of your answer where you've asked for the option of more detailed accessibility testing? |
An estimate of the minimum number of pages for each site is below. For pages under these domains we will only require a report against WCAG 2.1 AA https://publicaccess.westberks.gov.uk 15 pages https://www.civicaepay.co.uk/WestBerkshireEstore/estore/default/Catalog/Index 10 pages https://ats-westberkshire.jobsgopublic.com 5 pages https://westberks.spydus.co.uk 8 pages http://ww2.westberks.gov.uk 2 pages http://decisionmaking.westberks.gov.uk 15 pages https://ems.westberks.gov.uk 10 pages http://consult.westberks.gov.uk/portal 5 pages http://parish.westberks.gov.uk 5 pages http://jobs.westberks.gov.uk 5 pages https://www.homechoicewb.org.uk 5 pages https://www.westberkshireheritage.org/ 10 pages https://booking.westberks.gov.uk/heritage_events.html 10 pages https://booking.westberks.gov.uk/all_events.html 10 pages For pages under these domains we would also like the option of more detailed accessibility testing, budget permitting: https://www.westberks.gov.uk 8 pages https://citizen.westberks.gov.uk 6 pages https://info.westberks.gov.uk 15 pages https://directory.westberks.gov.uk 10 pages |