Awarded to Bunnyfoot Ltd.

Start date: Monday 6 April 2020
Value: £30,252
Company size: SME

Money and Pensions Service

User testing of a financial guidance website for the general public_Reaseach Lab and Participants

3 Incomplete applications

3 SME, 0 large

4 Completed applications

4 SME, 0 large

• Published: Friday 24 January 2020
• Deadline for asking questions: Friday 31 January 2020 at 11:59pm GMT
• Closing date for applications: Friday 7 February 2020 at 11:59pm GMT

Overview

• Summary of the work: 3 sets of moderated sessions to test designs for the navigation, search and unified contact system for a new website which merges the 3 legacy organisations that make up the MaPS, each session will comprise 12 users over two consecutive days, 6 for mobile and 6 for desktop.
• Location: London
• Research dates: Feb - March 2020 Supplier must be prepared to start within 1 week of the contract award notice
• Organisation the work is for: Money and Pensions Service
• Budget range: Budget up to £36,000 including VAT

About the work

• Early market engagement: N/A

About the research

• Description of your participants: Four users from each of three profiles per round: ; ; Struggling younger adults ; ; Aged 24-35 ; Single parent or child(ren) not living at home ; Unemployed/part-time/low-paid employment ; < £25k/yr income ; Social/private renting ; < £100 savings ; Struggle with bills ; Often/sometimes worry about debt ; 2 or more took/considered payday loan ; ; Squeezed families ; ; Aged 25-49 ; Married/cohabiting, at least one child at home ; Minimum one full time employed/household ; £25k-55k/yr household income ; Private renting/mortgage ; £100-600 savings ; Workplace/private pension ; Often/sometimes worry about bills ; 2 or more took/considered payday loan ; ; Cushioned empty nesters ; ; Aged 55-64 ; No children at home ; Any relationship status ; Minimum one full-time employed/household ; £35k-75k/yr household income ; Mortgage/own outright ; £10k+ savings ; Reasonable DC pension they have not accessed ; Considering retirement ; Have not had PensionWise appointment or consulted financial advisor ; Seldom/never worry about bills ; At least basic online skills. ; Willing to be recorded or filmed. ; Cannot have participated in user research in last 6 months. ; Cannot work in digital media, market research, design, psychology or related field ; Nor employed by a financial advisory service ; Living in UK 3+ years ; ; No more than 3 of same ethnicity per 2 day session ; Minimum 5 participants each on iOS and Android. ; If remote, minimum 5 participants each on macOS and Windows.
• Research location: 1st round may be in a lab in London or remote ; Subsequent rounds will be in a research lab in London. ; Supplier must also provide lab, or for remote tests must provide the video conference/desktop viewing software
• Number of research rounds: 3
• Number of participants a round: 12
• How often research will happen: Once every three weeks

Additional information

• Additional terms and conditions: Shortlisted Supplier taken forwards to the detailed evaluation stage will be required to register onto the MAPS e-sourcing portal: https://maps.app.jaggaer.com/web/login.html; ; - The supplier must also provide a research lab and incorporate this in to the price ; - For lab tests, supplier must provide a viewing area for at least 8 people needs to be available at the research lab with refreshments supplied. ; - For remote tests, supplier must provide video conference/desktop sharing software ; - Remote tests must be observable by at least 8 people ; - Supplier should provide a written report summarising all testing

Skills and experience

Buyers will use the essential and nice-to-have skills and experience to help them evaluate suppliers’ technical competence.

• Essential skills and experience:
  • Financial services research experience
  • Be able to provide a report of all testing rounds a week after it has taken place
  • Access to full recordings for all users
  • User researcher to work with internal UX designer to prepare research
• Nice-to-have skills and experience:
  • Eye tracking
  • Provide highlights of key points in video format
  • Live streaming via weblink
  • Separate note taker

How suppliers will be evaluated

All suppliers will be asked to provide a written proposal.

• How many suppliers to evaluate: 5
• Proposal criteria:
  • Approach to recruiting specialist participants
  • Your ability to demonstrate how you will manage participant attendance
  • How bidders identify risks and dependencies and offered approaches to manage them
  • Knowledge of financial services/guidance industry
  • Approach to mobile testing
  • Estimated timeframes for the work
  • Breakdown of recruitment costs and incentives
• Evaluation weighting:

  Technical competence

  20%

  Availability

  60%

  Price

  20%

Questions asked by suppliers

• 1. Are you looking for the supplier to create the test protocol? If yes, could this be adapted and re-used for each round of testing?: The supplier will not be required to create the test script.
• 2. For the report – are you looking for a summary of key findings and recommendations or a more detailed document including mocked up recommendations?: The report need only include key findings & recommendations.
• 3. To clarify, does the supplier need to Undertake the full project (not just recruit participants and provide lab environment) i.e.:• Prepare facilitation guide• Recruit and manage testers• Provide a lab or remote viewing facilities• Undertake the research moderation• Deliver a full report on the testing outcomes: The supplier will need to undertake almost the full project. They will need to recruit and manage testers, provide a lab or remote viewing facilities (for rounds 2 & 3 a lab is required), moderate the research, and deliver a report on the testing outcomes. MaPS will prepare the test script and build the prototype.
• 4. The budget is for the complete project — all three sessions, 12 users per.: The budget is for the complete project — all three sessions, 12 users per.
• 5. You've listed this under the "research participants" category but are also asking for facilitation. Should this be listed under outcomes?: MaPS researched the various DPS frameworks for this requirement before publishing the requirements under the 'find user research participants' option. Our main rational for this being that a number of providers within this lot also have the capability to also provide and or facilitate a test environment.